About us

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

PQ - 26th April 2011

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2011-04-26a.73.6

26 Apr 2011
Justice: Interpreting and Translation Services
House of Lords

Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the compatibility of the framework agreement for the provision of language services to the justice sector with the European Union Directive on the right for interpreting and translation in criminal proceedings.
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that, following the implementation of the framework agreement for the provision of language services to the justice sector, only those on the National Register of Public Service Interpreters will be used in court.

Lord McNally (Minister of State, Justice; Liberal Democrat)
We are currently seeking the views of interested parties on our proposals. Their views will help inform Ministers' forthcoming decision whether or not to let a framework agreement. We are satisfied that our proposals meet the requirements of the EU directive.
Maintaining appropriate quality standards is fundamental to our proposals. The proposed requirements for face to face interpretation of foreign languages would include, but would not be limited to, membership of the National Register of Public Service Interpreters.

Friday, 1 April 2011

Private Eye, Issue 1285, 1st April 2011


Police Interpreters

Lost for words

Police forces in the north-west England have been ordered to rethink their outsourcing of face-to-face interpreting following a legal challenge.
Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Lancashire and Cumbria police authorities had all entered into service agreements to use interpreters supplied by Applied Language Solutions (ALS). Previously they had simply hired individual freelance interpreters as needed. Many linguists were appalled by ALS’s poor rates of pay and were concerned that interpreters who were not on the National Register of Public Service Interpreters were being sent to interviews in breach of various national criminal justice guidelines. They decided to boycott the company (Eye 1280).
The Professional Interpreters Alliance, formed in response to the outsourcing, intended to challenge the agreements with ALS at a judicial review. But before the case was heard in court, police caved in and agreed to a settlement, signing a high court consent order admitting that their agreements with ALS were rotten.
“There was a risk of (even for a temporary period) the interested party [ALS] might not be able to supply interpreters for every assignment of the same quality and within the same time constraints as had been supplied under the previous arrangements,” the order noted. “The defendants knew, or ought to have known of that risk.”
The four police forces must now go back to the drawing board on the deal and pay the interpreters £20,000 costs. The decision should also give pause to the Ministry of Justice, which is pushing ahead with plans to outsource all foreign language interpreting for police and courts, with big agencies bidding for the work.

Private Eye, Issue 1285, 1st April 2011, Page 28.