Thursday, 18 May 2017

Scotland: Dundee patients with little grasp of English ‘lack trust’ of NHS interpreter service

https://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/fp/dundee-patients-little-grasp-english-lack-trust-nhs-interpreter-service/ 
18 May 2017

Dundee patients with little grasp of English ‘lack trust’ of NHS interpreter service
Patients in Dundee with little grasp of English are relying on friends and family to translate medical issues to GPs.
It is claimed such is the lack of trust in the interpreter service offered by NHS Tayside, “low level” English speaking patients routinely ask friends and families to communicate for them at medical appointments.
In one case, it is said one woman attended her doctor surgery with her five-year-old grandchild who arranged with the GP in question for medicine to be prescribed.
Patients also periodically turn up to appointments to discover an interpreter fluent in an alternative language has been booked, it is claimed.
Caroline Mckenna, from Dundee International Women’s Centre, believes the current interpreter provision service is “fundamentally flawed”.
The claims follow similar complaints from members of Tayside Deaf Forum, who accused NHS Tayside of providing an unreliable interpreter service to deaf people.
Caroline said: “We have more than 100 women who attend our centre weekly and our staff struggled to find anyone who even uses the NHS service now. It really is a poor situation.
“Interpreters themselves have expressed their disappointment.
“It actually wouldn’t take much to get it right. It is really frustrating.”
A spokesman for NHS Tayside said: “NHS Tayside is committed to the obligations and responsibilities under the Equality Act 2010 part of which is to ensure that we provide an interpretation service for patients where English isn’t their first language.
“We are still in the process of reviewing interpretation and translation services to allow us to consider how we deliver and manage interpretation and translation services in the future.”

Thursday, 11 May 2017

Monday, 8 May 2017

A matter of interpretation: Legal interpretation in Ireland

https://www.lawsociety.ie/News/News/Stories/A-matter-of-interpretation-Legal-interpretation-in-Ireland/#.WdrO-zBrzIW 
08/05/2017

A matter of interpretation: Legal interpretation in Ireland
There is a lack of training and testing of legal interpreters in Ireland, writes Mary Phelan in the April 2017 Gazette.
A demanding role
Legal interpreters should have a high level of proficiency in English and another language. However, the ability to speak two languages is not enough: they also need to master legal terminology in both languages and to be familiar with regional variations in terms of vocabulary and idioms. In addition, they require excellent short-term memory, along with consecutive and whispered simultaneous interpreting skills.
Furthermore, interpreters must be able to preserve the register (for example, formal or informal) used by a speaker. If a speaker makes a false start, or pauses, the false start or pause should be preserved in the interpretation. Interpreters also need to understand ethical principles applicable to legal interpreting. This makes for a role requiring significant training and competence.
No accreditation
However, there is no accredited training for legal interpreters in Ireland, writes Mary Phelan, Chair of the Irish Translators’ and Interpreters’ Association and lecturer in translation and interpreting at Dublin City University. Interpreters are not tested to establish their competence either.
In other jurisdictions where interpreters are tested, the failure rate is high. For example, in Britain, the pass rate on the Diploma in Public Service Interpreting is 20-30%. The assumption in Ireland, where interpreters for the Gardaí and the courts are outsourced, is that anyone who speaks English and another language can be an interpreter.
Given the lack of clear standards, Phelan writes, solicitors and judges need to establish the competence and training of any interpreter, and be mindful of best practice. Phelan sets out useful advice for practitioners on establishing whether an interpreter is necessary, assessing a potential interpreter, and navigating the ethical issues involved.
Read the full article in the April 2017 Gazette