After
an attempted murder trial was delayed for a second time last week, the useless
Capital-owned firm Applied Language Solutions (ALS – see Eyes passim) was billed by the client for failing to supply a court
interpreter.
The
wasted costs order was issued at Bradford crown court following a second
adjournment because no interpreter was available for Czech defendant Karel
Novotny. His lawyer quipped that it might be easier for him to learn Czech than
to wait for ALS to send anyone along.
The
order follows a letter from attorney general Dominic Grieve to Labour MP Emily
Thornberry saying that as ALS’s failure to provide interpreters “does not seem
to fall within the law of contempt”, it was “best addressed by wasted costs
[orders]”. A previous wasted costs application at Snaresbrook crown court was
rejected when the judge put ALS’s problems down to “teething troubles”, but
patience is now wearing thin and the legal press reports that many more
solicitors intend to apply for such orders if their cases suffer further
delays.
The
whole interpreting contract could become costly for ALS, but it’s also working
out to be pretty pricey for the court service too. Last Friday a retrial had to
be ordered at a cost of £25,000 after a four-day hearing in a burglary case –
also a Snaresbrook – was wrecked by an ALS Romanian interpreter who muddled the
words “bitten” and “beaten” and didn’t realise the mistake until it came up in
cross-examination.
Private Eye, issue 1312, 20 April to 3 May 2012, page 5.
No comments:
Post a Comment