Trial stopped as murder case translator was only there because his wife - the real interpreter - was 'too busy to show up'
A murder
trial turned into a farce when an interpreter confessed half-an-hour into vital
evidence that he was a fake, filling in for his busy wife.
The judge
halted the trial of Rajvinder Kaur, who killed her mother-in-law with a rolling
pin, when the court realised interpreter Mubarak Lone was leaving out key words
and phrases in his translating.
Mr Lone
was interpreting for Kaur’s husband, Iqbal Singh, who spoke Punjabi, but
struggled to even get the oath right for the Sikh witness at Winchester Crown
Court in Hampshire.
He was
finally caught out by junior counsel Sukhdev Garcha, who also spoke the language,
half-an-hour into the faltering evidence.
In the
absence of the jury, Mr Lone was forced to confess to Mr Justice Barnett that
he was not a qualified translator and was awaiting the results of his
interpreter test.
He later
revealed that his wife - the booked interpreter - was busy and he had come to
do her job instead.
It comes
after a series of problems with translators supplied by Applied Language
Solutions (ALS), who were recently given a Government contract to
supply translators to courts.
Judges
and court officials across the country have criticised the Ministry of
Justice's deal with ALS after stories of translators failing to arrive for
trials or unable to accurately interpret proceedings for defendants, witnesses
and victims.
Kaur, 37,
was yesterday sentenced to life imprisonment and told she would serve a minimum
term of 11 years for battering her mother-in-law Baljit Kaur Buttar to death
with a rolling pin at her home in Southampton last February.
Defence
barrister Jonathan Fuller QC said Mr Lone wrongly translated words, such as
saying 'bitter; instead of 'irritable' and 'Allah' instead of 'One God'.
But the
farce continued.
A second
translator drafted in to cover the case, was 'completely out of her depth' and
in the end the case was only able to continue with the assistance of Mr Garcha.
In total
it wasted a day of work at the court, at a cost of tens of thousands of pounds.
Mr Garcha
said: 'I couldn’t believe the first interpreter was so woefully inadequate and
then it happened again with the second who was completely out of her depth.
'She
didn’t understand a lot of words and phrases and her vocabulary was completely
lacking.
'If I hadn’t
spoken up then people in the court would have thought everything was being
interpreted correctly.
'It would
have been to the detriment of our client - we could have had a miscarriage of
justice.
'That’s
the price you pay.'
Defence
barrister Jonathan Fuller QC added: 'It’s at the very heart of the justice
system because the words are the evidence.
'If you
find, as a defence counsel, that you are calling evidence on words that are
unreliable then that is the start of a miscarriage of justice.'
Mr Justice
Barnett told the court: ‘This is extremely unfortunate, to use a classic
understatement.’
In a
brief statement, ALS said it would not comment on individual cases.
‘Any complaints received about interpreters are investigated thoroughly and, where necessary, the interpreter is suspended from working with ALS until the investigation is complete.
‘Any complaints received about interpreters are investigated thoroughly and, where necessary, the interpreter is suspended from working with ALS until the investigation is complete.
'At that
point ALS will either remove them from its register, reinstate them or provide
further training, as appropriate,’ it said.
ALS has
claimed its contract, which started formally on February 1, would save the
Government £60 million over five years.
But many
interpreters said they had boycotted the firm in reaction to low rates of pay,
claiming that led to a struggle by ALS to recruit translators, and prompting
the use of untrained people in courts.
The
company is being monitored daily after failing to meet targets. It was eight
per cent off target from January to April this year, prompting action from the
Ministry of Justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment